But persistent misperceptions about it, most especially among affluent consumers, are a function of its spectacular success, not its failure. dependence on large farms is not a conspiracy by big corporations. It is this central role of large, corporate, and industrial-style farms that critics point to as evidence that the food system needs to be transformed.īut U.S. The largest farms, by contrast, account for about 50 percent of output, relying on simplified production systems and economies of scale to feed a nation of 330 million people, vanishingly few of whom live anywhere near a farm or want to work in agriculture. farms, they produce less than 10 percent of total output. But while small farms like these account for close to half of all U.S. In the popular bourgeois imagination, the idealized farm looks something like the ones that sell produce at local farmers markets. Most have never set foot on a farm or, at least, not on the sort of farm that provides the vast majority of food that people in wealthy nations like the United States consume. In some ways, it is not surprising that many of the best fed, most food-secure people in the history of the human species are convinced that the food system is broken.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |